Deep reflection: I wasted eight years in encryption


Author:@kenchangeh
_Other Organiser
Over time, however, I feel I have lost course in the area of encrypted currency. After full-time investment, the temptation of the original transformative force of encrypted currency gradually faded. I am disappointed by my target client and the target group for which I truly strive. I completely misunderstood the difference between the true users and the objects of encrypted money. I am fully convinced that the encrypted currency claims that it contributes to the decentrization of the financial system, but in fact it is simply a supersystem of speculation and gambling and a replica of the existing economy。
Realism slapped me hard. I'm not building a new financial system. I built a casino. A casino that does not claim to be a casino, but it is the largest, all-weather online casino ever conceived by our generation. On the one hand, I'm proud to have spent at least 20 years building this casino. On the other hand, I feel like I wasted my whole 20s on it. I wasted my life on it, but at least I earned a lot of money。
ENCRYPTION MONEY IS CONFUSING. ON THE ONE HAND, SOME ADVOCATES CLAIM THAT THEY WANT TO COMPLETELY REPLACE THE EXISTING FINANCIAL SYSTEM WITH A SYSTEM BASED ON BLOCK CHAINS. I CAN EASILY IMAGINE SUCH A SYSTEM -- YOU JUST NEED USDC OR BITCOIN IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT, AND YOU CAN SEND A BILLION DOLLARS TO ANYONE IN THE WORLD IN SECONDS. THE IDEA IS POWERFUL, AND I STILL BELIEVE IN IT。
However, incentives have completely distorted reality. In the real world, every market participant is willing to invest in the next generation of Layer 1 (Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, etc.). The 2020 Layer 1 battle resulted in only one winner - Solana. This led to a strong preference for a fourth position (bitcoin, Ethera, Solana and others). This incentive mechanism supports the market value of hundreds of billions of dollars, but does it really contribute to net growth to the desired new financial system? Although venture capitalists will write 5,000 words to illustrate this view, the answer is no, it has not led to the creation of a new system. In fact, it burns almost everyone's money (both in the diaspora and in the venture capitalists), so that in the new financial system everyone's money is less。
I'M NOT JUST ABOUT THE L1 PLATFORM. IN THE AREA OF ENCRYPTED CURRENCY, I CAN CITE MANY SIMILAR EXAMPLES — SPOT-TO-CENTRE EXCHANGE (DEX), REAL-TIME DE-CENTRE EXCHANGE (DEX), FORECASTING MARKETS, MONETIZATION PLATFORM, ETC. THESE SUBDIVISIONS OF MARKET FANATICISM AND COMPETITION DO NOT CONTRIBUTE POSITIVELY TO THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF A BETTER FINANCIAL SYSTEM. CONTRARY TO WHAT VENTURE CAPITALISTS SAY, WE DON'T NEED TO MOVE CASINOS TO MARS。
If I had said that I had no economic motivation to join in the area of encrypted currency, it would have been a lie. As a reader, you might think I've made enough money to get out of the encryption industry, which sounds hypocritical. Yes, perhaps I am. But maybe I am just sick of the mudslides that fuel economic financialization and gambling。
A zero-sum game is not a way of accumulating wealth over time. It looks like it, but it's not. Eight years of crawling in the area of encrypted currency have completely destroyed my ability to identify sustainable business models. In the area of encrypted money, you don't need a successful business or product to make money. The encrypted currency industry is full of very high-value, almost unsuspecting, coins。
The real world does not work that way. If you really want to create value for your customers, not just gambling and gambling, which, by the way, is what casinos do, this zero-sum business model is not working。
I once thought that financial nihilism was a cute and harmless concept. And I think it's okay to keep rolling zero-sum games to the next generation. I have no doubt that bitcoin will reach $1 million one day. But this has nothing to do with the financial game that the industry is making。
This industry mentality is extremely harmful, and I believe it will lead to the long-term collapse of social mobility for the younger generation. You have witnessed it with your own eyes, and I think it is really important for us to muster the courage to resist the temptation of those worthless games。
CMS Holdings once said, "Do you want to make money or do you want to prove yourself right?" This time, I chose to prove myself right。
--
EDITOR'S NOTE: THE BLOGGER'S ARTICLE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED BY MANY PEOPLE IN THE INDUSTRY
DubleZero co-founderAustin Federa:
I respect your awareness that your ethics are incompatible with your current behaviour. This requires courage and self-reflection, and it is not easy. But from a broader point of view, I think that the natural state of encrypted money is almost the end of the economy, and I wonder if it is worth our concern. The charm of encrypted money is that it strips us of the most fundamental and primitive dimensions, forcing us to construct on fundamental principles. I often think of the opening of the television show Silicon Valley, which truly demonstrates self-deception in the context of the traditional economic order. I like encrypted money because it confronts all hypocrisy and reveals the truth。
Dragonfly's management partner Haseeb Qureshi:
Crypto _Painter:
Well, that's true. I can see that the author's heart is broken and that the secret market has become a bunch of gamblers and casinos...
But interestingly, I heard the same thing in 2018, and in 2022, if the logic of the encrypted market is understood, then it's obvious that when there's an influx of outside capital, there's bound to be a boom for gamblers and casinos...
And gambling markets naturally consume surplus liquidity...
So the whole encrypted market creates a cycle of "value investment" -- "confidence investment" -- "emotional speculation" -- "total disappointment"...
IN EARLY 2023, THE SOUND OF BTC AND VALUE INVESTMENTS IN THE MARKET WAS SO GREAT THAT TODAY ' S BLIGHT IS SO COLD。
But this is how the encrypted money market continues to come along in a cycle of "convincing" - "questioning" - "negative" - and we don't need to believe that a certain public chain will eventually succeed, but we just need to believe that decentralised web narratives will last forever。
In the future, there will be new mobility, followed by prosperity and a chicken hair, but as long as the reach of this narrative expands, the long-term direction of the market will eventually be upwards。
The years 2025-2026 are a phase of questioning, and there may be a period of disappointment in the future, but human nature, whether investment or speculation, has the value of eternal survival。
Casinos and gamblers are only small gaps in foam reduction, and the market has its own regulatory mechanisms, so we, in turn, thank the garbage casinos and garbage projects。
Their emergence represents a self-regulating part of the market, without which there would be no bubble-based enrichment。
Learn to accept this disgusting market phenomenon in order to accept the size of the next bubble。
Quai Network co-founder
You're absolutely right. The encrypted currency has gradually become a tool that is no longer dedicated to promoting financial sovereignty or expanding market cakes, but is extracting benefits. The line between building financial systems for the benefit of humanity and turning them into instruments of gambling is blurred. Each project and founder must make a choice: Do they really want to make the world a better place, or do they just want to participate in this game? ... while it may be easy to get numb, I suggest you take a deep look at the real projects that are still advancing the spirit of code punk. That's really exciting. That's where the real game can be played. Interestingly, I think the next direction of encrypted money is actually more like bitcoin. The narratives surrounding privacy (e.g. Zcash, Monero), old encrypted currency (e.g. Dash, Decred, etc.) and Workload Certification (POW) projects will return。