Interpretation of the new architecture of the Taifung Foundation: a reaffirmation of self-sovereignty in the trend towards institutionalization

Author:CM

 

The EF proposes a new structure to take this opportunity to re-exploit the ETA Worldview. Crypto is in the middle of a huge wave, where the Ether is headed。

EF LAID OFF 20 PER CENT OF ITS STAFF AND ANNOUNCED AN ENTIRELY NEW STRUCTURE -5 work floorsI DON'T KNOW. COMPARED TO THE FORMER LOOSE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE, EF WILL CLEARLY DEFINE WHAT IT SHOULD DO IN THE COMING YEARS. THE FIVE JOB LEVELS ARE:

• Protocol Layer

• Access Layer

• User Layer

• Community Layer

• Institutal Layer

WE CAN INTERPRET IT AS THE DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES WITHIN THE EF。

1/5 Protocol Layer

Maintaining the core properties of the Ether House, which Vitalik has been emphasizingCROPS:

• Censorship-resistant(anti-censorship)

• Robust(Lu Bong)

• Open(open)

• Private(in private)

• Secure(Security)

MORE SPECIFIC WORK IS CARRIED OUT ON BOTTOM-UP TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS SAFE ADVANCEMENT OF HARD-DRIVE FORK, REDUCTION OF CREDIBLE DEPENDENCE, RESISTANCE TO QUANTUM THREATS, RESISTANCE TO TOXIC MEVS, ETC. THIS PART IS THE BOTTOM LINE OF THE EF AND THE CORE VALUE OF THE TAIFUNG, WHICH HAS BEEN ADVOCATED NOT TO SACRIFICE ITS SELF-SOVEREIGN IDENTITY FOR SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL, INSTITUTIONAL OR MARKET NARRATIVES。

OF COURSE, THIS IS DIFFICULT IN THIS ENVIRONMENT, BECAUSE, FROM THE USER'S POINT OF VIEW, HUGGING INSTITUTIONS, HUGGING MARKETS, IS ALWAYS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR BEING LAZY AND EVASIVE IN MARKETING. IF WE LOOK AT TAIFENG AS THE BOTTOM LINE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER, IT IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT TO ACTIVELY MEET THE NEEDS OF THE VARIOUS PLAYERS IN THE NEW WORLD, WITHOUT LEAVING THE BOTTOM LINE, IN ORDER TO GIVE THE WORLD A PLACE TO EXIST AND TO LEAVE THE UTOPIA OF THE POLAR WORLD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. OF COURSE, THIS DOES NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE DONE BY THE EF, WHICH HAS REPEATEDLY EXPRESSED THEIR POSITIONS AND ROLES, AND I HOPE THAT THERE WILL BE MORE ORGANIZATIONS TO DO THIS IN THE FUTURE。

2/5 — Access Layer

Access Layer is concerned about whether users can really use Etherum's self-sovereign capabilities in practice. EF mentioned several key actions:Read chains, transactions, certificates, authorizations, exitsi don't know. users and future agents representing user actions should be able to do this without relying on unverifiable intermediaries。

There's a very important principle herezero optionIt means that there must be a credible alternative path for each intermediated path, without intermediaries, and that this path must be continuously available。

I think this is crucial, the most direct example of how you can still operate your funds by interacting directly with the contract, if you've been trapped once, and you can understand its meaning。

3/5 User Layer

The task of User Layer is to base the work of EF on the needs of real users and organizations. It focuses on the hierarchy of users, the image of users, and it exists to connect Protocol Layer and Access Layer, so that development can truly reach users, so that these decisions can actually work, not just imagine, in their own world。

This was previously lacking in EF, and in the past much of the discussion was too research- or infrastructure-oriented. We can see clearly the past prosperity of the Ether Workshop, which basically came from innovation in the community, with no intersections between the application and the technology, nor with the demand for feedback from the application end to the technology end, so that the Ether Workshop has broken into an unexpected boom。

it is a matter of luck for some, and it is said that this is a logical consequence of the sinking of the technology of the typhus. in fact, the eta did lead to a major explosion in the chain, and crypto was sort of entering a new era in which developers and users did not have much choice, so smart people, smart people, and money, were all gathered in the eta。

TODAY, HOWEVER, THE SITUATION IS VERY DIFFERENT, WITH L1 AND L2 EVERYWHERE, AND THE COST OF THE HAIR CHAIN IS FALLING RAPIDLY. ALTHOUGH THE ETA REMAINS THE LARGEST MOAT OF SAFETY AND STABILITY, THIS VALUE IS NOT EASILY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF USERS AND DEVELOPERS WHEN OTHER OPPONENTS ARE NOT EXPOSED. I PERSONALLY AGREE THAT SECURITY IS THE BIGGEST MOAT IN THE CHAIN

So User Layer is one of EF's most important tasks, and a new world needs to know what its inhabitants want。

4/5. Community Layer

Its raison d ' être is to preserve and disseminate the Etherwood consensus on values。

• Inside the ecology: Help communities understand why Etheum exists, what to insist on, and what not to be influenced by。

• Outside the ecologyHELPING THE EF TO ESTABLISH LINKS WITH NEIGHBOURING AREAS SUCH AS OPEN SOURCES, PRIVACY, CIVIL LIBERTIES, PUBLIC INTEREST TECHNOLOGY, ETC。

SO WHAT IS THE CONSENSUS IT WANTS TO BUILD? ACCORDING TO THE EF ARTICLE, AND IN THE LIGHT OF MY KNOWLEDGE OF THE ETA, THE FOLLOWING POINTS ARE INCLUDED:

1. Not being held hostage by the interests of the center

2. Maintaining technological neutrality, free from any cultural, political, etc

3. TO UPHOLD THE VALUES OF CROPS AND NOT TO SACRIFICE ANYTHING FOR SHORT-TERM COMMERCIAL GAIN

The slowdown in consensus in this cycle, which I think is the worst in history, has not yet reached the mainstream view, with few user groups, few users, no applications, and poor prices, problems that have not lost users to centralization is confidence in the future. And with the appearance of the BTC, ETF, DAT, the United States Stabilisation Currency Act, and the agency ' s initial deployment of L1, which has brought more people to crypto, this has been a great success. However, its effects are slowly becoming apparent, which are not easy to detect, but are gradually changing the bottom logic of the market。

For example, a large number of stable currencies went up the chain, bringing in TVLs, replacing BTC, ETH ' s monetary attributes, and it was long before the word currency was heard. Before USDT was first born, the exchange used the currency trade model, most of which was traded by BTC, and most of the LPs in the defi summer era were traded by ETH, and notft summer by ETH. Today, these things are disappearing, with the big hand of dollar hegemony reaching the block chain, and DAT packaging Crypto as its worst in the year。

With regard to de-centreization, the point of view was that it was not transparent, corrupt and inefficient to confront traditional finance and that it was necessary for institutions to de-centre. In fact, the issue does not require much thought, and the need for decentrization must be limited or in some particular contexts. The term "centreization " is less and less spoken, and even somewhat cynical。

of course, i see no reason why crypto should reject the needs of the institution, which does not require permission, whether it is an institution or an individual user, and should be accepted. but if the bottom line of the public chain is changed in order to meet institutional entry, and the bottom line of the public chain is changed, we cannot define it as wrong, but the end of this move is no different from the second internet. several authorities hold the nodes of the network, and if these chains continue to develop in this situation, it will soon become a national chain, an institutional chain, and it will not be easy to cut iran’s business off from the american chain. it also seems reasonable that many here refer to the public chain of neutrality and decentrization as the high seas。

5/5. Institutional Layer

RESPONSIBLE FOR EF INTERACTIONS WITH INSTITUTIONS, SUBJECT TO SELF-SOVEREIGNTY. INSTEAD OF “MAKING IT EASIER FOR INSTITUTIONS TO CONTROL USERS”, EF USES A DESCRIPTION OF INSTITUTIONS TO EMPHASIZE THE CREATION OF BETTER INTEGRATED CASES FOR USE IN OVERN AND PASSWORD TECHNOLOGY。

This statement is clear, as we have discussed above, that the business of true universal business, of continuous service to global users, is still best placed on the Etherwood chain, because it will never be interfered with by certain means and factors. The longer it takes with the ecology of central control, the more difficult it is to do so。

At the end of the sentence, we are in the midst of an enormous wave that cannot be changed. But bitcoin and the Ethera have experienced countless market changes, and the next block is usually out of shape, both outside and at dawn and in darkness。