Litecoin

Views: No blow, no blow. I give OpenClaw 65 points

2026/03/10 13:23
🌐en

It would be disappointing if you were to play lobster with the idea of making money or leading Web 4.0。

Views: No blow, no blow. I give OpenClaw 65 points
Original title: "Who's in the black lobster? Who's in the lobster?"
Original author: 0xTod, Notting Research Partner

I think there's a really bad mood right now: either blow the lobster/OpenClaw down to the gods, or just turn it into an information pan。

I think I could give the lobster a 65, 100 points。

It's just three of them

Lobsters are basically: the outside brain (Claude, GPT, Mini Max, etc.) + hands-on + super long hints。

SoFirst of all, you can't expect a breakthrough in its IQIt's got no IQ. It's 99% IQ depending on what model you use。

Of course, I suspect some of these people blow it upOne of the main reasons is..They didn't use Claude Opus 4.6 before. Now through some transit stations, like OpenRouter, with Claude, and suddenly with a new model, it feels like IQ。

The second point is the ability to do it。

THESE AIS WERE CONSULTANTS BEFORE, OF COURSE NOBODY LIKED THEM. NOW THEY'RE KIND OF LIKE EMPLOYEES BECAUSE THEY'RE CAPABLE. BUT TO BE HONEST, IT'S AN INTERN, BUT IT'S SWEET。

Third, the hint。

Because lobsters have a super-long hint. To be honest, the vast majority of people do not have that level of hint。

So when you're done with it, you're like, "Oh, my God, the lobster is amazing!"

And humans are lazy, and no one and no one talk with tradition is willing to make a giant hint。

Who's in Black Lobster

But, on the other hand, there is nothing to be done by someone who devalues lobster, and I understand their motives。

Lobster only spends money, not money。

Because, in essence, it's not just a lobster problem. You can even use GPT, Claude, these AIs you can't make money with。

FORGET IT, AI. THE CURRENCY RACE

PS: AI ENDED UP WINNING THE BEAN BAG -- BECAUSE THE BEAN BAG DIDN'T OPEN。

They do not earn money in their normal form, not because they are wrapped up in lobsters, because they do not change their IQ。

BECAUSE AI REALLY CAN'T MAKE MONEY, SOME PEOPLE CAN ONLY DO IT BY INSTALLING AND SELLING CLASSES。

If you want to make money by selling lessons and installing them, you're gonna have to blow the lobster to the ground, and that's what Momon did。

In that case, it's just a 65-point thing in itself, and you make it 130, and it's Web 4.0 revolution。

you've actually spent half a day and then you've found out that there's no 130 points. naturally, this loss will be very strong. buyers show vs sellers show big gaps, and it's really hard not to roll over。

My opinion

I kind of like lobster if you let me judge。

I think it's nice to have someone with it, as I said before。

And I'm using Minimax M2.5, and the cost of domestic production is very low, and Claude Haiku, so I found a sweet zone。

Talk to me, do a little work, don't spend much, Token, it's nice。

It's also a pony crossing. What friends use is Claude Opus 4.6, which is 20 times my price, and if you don't make something good, it's frustrating。

I didn't spend any money, I couldn't use anything, and I didn't feel any pain。

After all, Vibe Coding is a new age tiger machine, and I'm playing five cents a time, and you play a dollar a time, even if I have a slightly lower rate, but the price gap makes me feel completely different。

We can't fight a horse with security concerns

You know, it's been three months since OpenClaw went beyond the 24 million Stars accumulated by React in 13 years and left behind a 40-year-old Linux kernel。

But I don't know the number of bugs in OpenClaw, and left Linux behind。

Look closely at the OpenClaw page on GitHub, the Star number is really all over Top 10. That Issue all sorts of bugs have reached amazing 5,000+。

What's the concept? This is because the GitHub project can only show up to 5,000+ bug Issue。

It's not OpenClaw's limit, it's GitHub's limit。

In contrast, another 200,000-star open source software, Vue, Issue, is only 359。

So I don't think a lot of ordinary people really fit in with open source software。Open source software is best used by people with a certain base, especially those with security awareness。

You give OpenClaw a lot of powers, so I think it's stolen, right

(It's not really a few of the real thieves, but it's very powerful. When you say hundreds of thousands of people are running naked, and when your credit card's been brushed off, you're going to make some people feel negative about lobster

At this point, you can't ask for an open-source extremist software with Gemini, Claude, and soybean bags, and ask them about the level of sophisticated, secure software for the general public。

It's a taco race。

There's a word in software development called "deaf mechanisms". Those traditional AIs do well, but the lobsters are now Bug a basket. After all, it's open source software, and it's even open source software written by vibe coding。

Even Google, there was a news story about a man in Florida who talked to Gemini for a long time and eventually committed suicide, and his family took Google to court。

You think big companies still have problems with safety standards, let alone lobster, right

Summary: Am I going to install lobster

So all in all, all in all, you let me make an objective evaluation of lobster, I think:

If you have some kind of technical base, and you like it, then you'll take it as a research subject。

Or you're just a busy man trying to get eggs from Shenzhen。

I think it's fun, too. Just play lobster in this mood。

But it would still be disappointing not to have the idea of making big money or leading Web 4.0。

If you're always busy, and you're not busy, then you're using regular Claude, with Gemini, even with beans, with DeepSeek, and I don't think you're gonna miss much of this revolution。

THE WORD FOMO IS A FEAR OF BEING MISSED. BUT I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR DECADES, AND I'M TELLING YOU, IT'S NOT TOO MUCH。

Original Link

QQlink

Không có cửa hậu mã hóa, không thỏa hiệp. Một nền tảng xã hội và tài chính phi tập trung dựa trên công nghệ blockchain, trả lại quyền riêng tư và tự do cho người dùng.

© 2024 Đội ngũ R&D QQlink. Đã đăng ký Bản quyền.